There was a union information on Wednesday night. I didn't attend it partly because I had another commitment and partly because I expected it to be much the same as previous meetings: lots of discussion of the implications of a strike vote but no change in course. From talking with others who had attended my conclusion is thus: the government is offering a bad deal and the union is recommending that we reject it. As usual, everyone wants to reject it but no one wants to go on strike. So the question becomes: is it more worthwhile to accept a bad deal and keep working or risk a strike and hope that something better comes along?
I feel caught between the posturing of union and government negotiator. I would hope that some day soon the union will realize that the current mode of negotiating a contract, using the threat of a strike, does not work. What the union seems to forget at times such as these are the following points:
- when we strike, we save the government money (always an important consideration when the government has a deficit)
- we do not have public support or at least very little
- time and money lost on the picket line is never recovered
- at the end of a strike, the government can afford to present us with a better offer (but is it worth the cost?)
No comments:
Post a Comment